๐Œ๐š๐ง๐ฎ๐Ÿ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ โ€™๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐‘๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ญโ€™๐ฌ ๐ƒ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ: ๐’๐ญ๐ซ๐ž๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก, ๐…๐ซ๐š๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ, ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐…๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐€๐๐š๐ฉ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐’๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ฆ๐ฌ

My add-to Jeff Winterโ€™s post:

Think of manufacturing evolution like a Prince Rupertโ€™s Drop, a glass structure thatโ€™s nearly indestructible at its head but shatters instantly if the tail is broken. The key lesson? What seems strong can actually be fragile, and what seems fragile can become resilient with the right systems in place.


๐“๐ก๐ž ๐…๐ซ๐š๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐ž ๐“๐š๐ข๐ฅ: ๐†๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ฅ-๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž ๐Œ๐š๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ž ๐“๐จ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฌ (๐Ÿ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ“๐ŸŽ๐ฌ) โ†’ The Breaking Point

In the early days, manufacturing relied on general-purpose machine tools, versatile but slow, disconnected, and unable to scale. This was the true fragile tail of the system.

โ–ซ๏ธ These machines worked fine for craft production, but under pressure (higher demand, complexity, efficiency needs), they failed catastrophically, just like snapping the tail of a Prince Rupertโ€™s Drop.

โ–ซ๏ธ This forced a major shift toward dedicated production lines, trading flexibility for strength.

Breakage Moment: The industrial revolution demanded speed, and general-purpose tools simply couldnโ€™t keep up.


๐“๐ก๐ž ๐ˆ๐ง๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐‡๐ž๐š๐: ๐Œ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐๐ฎ๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง (๐Ÿ๐Ÿ—๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ“) โ†’ Strong but Inflexible

When Henry Ford introduced assembly lines and mass production, manufacturing became nearly indestructible, just like the head of the Prince Rupertโ€™s Drop.

โ–ซ๏ธ Strength came from scale, efficiency, and standardization.

โ–ซ๏ธ It was designed to handle massive stress, just like the thick glass of the dropโ€™s head.

โ–ซ๏ธ The downside? Zero adaptability. The system only worked if everything stayed the same.

Hidden Weakness: Rigid systems couldnโ€™t flex, creating a new point of fragility.


๐“๐ก๐ž ๐๐ž๐ฐ ๐‡๐ž๐š๐: ๐‘๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ง๐Ÿ๐ข๐ ๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐Œ๐š๐ง๐ฎ๐Ÿ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐  (๐“๐จ๐๐š๐ฒ) โ†’ Strong Under Pressure

Fast forward to today. Reconfigurable, AI-driven manufacturing lines are the new indestructible head.

โ–ซ๏ธ Systems are now adaptive. AI, IoT, and automation create resilience.

โ–ซ๏ธ Processes can pivot instantly. Supply chain shifts? No problem. Demand spikes? Adjust in real time.

โ–ซ๏ธ Stress is managed dynamically. Instead of breaking under change, systems evolve.

Unlike the fragile tail of general-purpose tools, these systems can withstand extreme pressure and still function.

โ€œ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐ฎ๐Ÿ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐  (๐š๐ง๐ ๐€๐ˆ-๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ง ๐›๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ) ๐ข๐ฌ๐งโ€™๐ญ ๐š๐›๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž, ๐ข๐ญโ€™๐ฌ ๐š๐›๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐š๐›๐ฌ๐จ๐ซ๐›๐ข๐ง๐  ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ข๐ง ๐ข๐ญโ€.

Ive always thought if Prince Rupert had a saying it would go something likeโ€ฆ โ€œ๐ท๐‘œ๐‘›โ€™๐‘ก ๐‘“๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘”๐‘’๐‘ก ๐‘ก๐‘œ ๐‘Ž๐‘™๐‘ค๐‘Ž๐‘ฆ๐‘  ๐‘ค๐‘Ž๐‘ก๐‘โ„Ž ๐‘ฆ๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘™โ€โ€ฆ๐Ÿ˜†

๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ: The views within any of my posts, or newsletters are not those of my employer. ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐Ÿ‘ this? Feel free to reshare, repost, and join the conversation.

Picture of Doug Shannon

Doug Shannon

Doug Shannon, a top 50 global leader in intelligent automation, shares regular insights from his 20+ years of experience in digital transformation, AI, and self-healing automation solutions for enterprise success.